The University of Sydney  - Home
An image of Coogee Beach

Coogee Conference 2026

3 – 6 February 2026. Coogee Bay Hotel, Coogee, Sydney.

Sydney Quantum Information Theory Workshop

3-6 February 2026

Coogee Bay Hotel, Coogee, Sydney

This will be a small, focussed workshop bringing together leading and up-and-coming international and Australian researchers in quantum information theory. The aim is to present new, exciting results with lots of time for scientific discussion. The program will consist of a limited number of invited talks along with time set aside for conversation. PhD students and postdocs are very welcome and encouraged to participate.

Speakers

  • Abhishek Rajput (Oxford)
  • Alexander Cowtan (Xanadu)
  • Anqi Gong (ETH Zurich)
  • Basudha Srivastava (PsiQuantum)
  • Chris Pattison (UC Berkeley)
  • Dongjin Lee (Perimeter Institute)
  • Emma Rosenfeld (Google)
  • Esha Swaroop (U. Waterloo)
  • Friederike Butt (Aachen)
  • Grace Sommers (Princeton)
  • Jun Zen (OIST)
  • Josias Old (Aachen)
  • Madelyn Cain (Harvard) – No longer able to attend
  • Michael Vasmer (Inria Paris)
  • Paul Webster (Iceberg Quantum)
Talks and abstracts

Abhishek Rajput

Sequences of Bivariate Bicycle Codes from Covering Graphs

We show that given an instance of a bivariate bicycle (BB) code, it is possible to generate an infinite sequence of new BB codes using increasingly large covering graphs of the original code’s Tanner graph. When a BB code has a Tanner graph that is a hh-fold covering of the base BB code’s Tanner graph, we refer to it as a hh𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑒\textit{cover code}. We show that for a BB code to be a hh-cover code, its lattice parameters and defining polynomials must satisfy simple algebraic conditions relative to those of the base code. By extending the graph covering map to a chain map, we show there are induced projection and lifting maps on (co)homology that enable the projection and lifting of logical operators and, in certain cases, automorphisms between the base and the cover code. The search space of cover codes is considerably reduced compared to the full space of possible polynomials and we find that many interesting examples of BB codes, such as the [[144,12,12]][[144,12,12]] gross code, can be viewed as cover codes. We also apply our method to search for BB codes with weight 8 checks and find many codes, including a [[64,14,8]][[64,14,8]] and [[144,14,14]][[144,14,14]] code. For an hh-cover code of an [[n,k,d]][[n,k,d]] BB code with parameters [[nh=hn,khk,ddhhd]][[n_h = hn, k_h \geq k, d \leq d_h \leq hd]], we prove that khkk_h \geq k and dhhdd_h \leq hd when hh is odd. Furthermore if hh is odd and kh=kk_h = k, we prove the lower bound ddhd \leq d_h. We conjecture it is always true that an hh-cover BB code of a base [[n,k,d]][[n,k,d]] BB code has parameters [[nh=hn,khk,ddhhd]][[n_h = hn, k_h \geq k, d \leq d_h \leq hd]]. While the focus of this work is on bivariate bicycle codes, we expect these methods to generalise readily to many group algebra codes. 

Alexander Cowtan

The Spaces Between: performing quantum code surgery without idling

In reducing the spacetime overhead of surgery with quantum LDPC codes, there has been a focus on increasing parallelism and reducing the number of syndrome rounds per surgery operation (“single-shot surgery”). An oft-overlooked overhead is the idling time between rounds of surgery, present to prevent low-weight logical faults which extend between rounds. Generic upper bounds imply that O(d) rounds are sufficient, but this would be a burdensome slowdown on a real quantum computer, and is widely believed to be unnecessary in practice.

I will first describe a formalism which captures the spacetime volume of surgery operations performed sequentially, by taking mapping cones on 4-term fault complexes. I will then give results which prove when idling is unnecessary and waiting only O(1) rounds is sufficient. These results come in two flavours: (A) conditions on the properties of the ancilla systems used for surgery, and (B) conditions on the local-testability of the original code.

Anqi Gong

Logical gates in some algebraic codes

Algebraic structures in quantum error-correcting codes can usually facilitate logical computation. Polynomial formalism provides a way to investigate the Clifford and non-Clifford gate possibilities in these codes. I will give two types of examples in this talk. The first is Reed-Muller codes; both the punctured versions encoding one logical qubit and a high-rate family but with prudent gauge-fixing will be presented. The latter enables one to implement arbitrary in-block logical CNOT gates through physical permutations only, thereby having the potential to speed up logical computation. The second type concerns small algebraic geometry codes. Based on these codes, we give various practically relevant magic state distillation protocols and propose their application in certain algorithm subroutines.

Basudha Srivastava

Sequential decoding of concatenated codes

Christopher Pattison

Fault-tolerant quantum computer with a constant number of control lines

Delivering control signals to qubits is a substantial bottleneck for many quantum computing platforms. In this work, we give a construction of a fault-tolerant 2D geometrically-local quantum processor where computation is implemented by the repeated application of a hard-coded constant-depth gate sequence along with individual control of a constant number of qubits analogous to I/O pins in classical integrated circuits. For platforms where global driving of qubits or local fixed control pulse generation is possible, we interpret our construction as a 2D quantum processor with unit density of wires and a constant number of wires to the outside world: The repeated circuit may be implemented by broadcasting gate signals to large numbers of qubits analogous to clock signals distributed by clock distribution networks in digital integrated circuits. While the construction is unlikely to be practical in the near term, the scheme substantially benefits from the tight integration of classical digital logic with high density qubit technologies and may become feasible after further technology development.

Dongjin Lee

Chiral Color Code: Single-shot error correction for exotic topological order and beyond.

In this talk, I will introduce a family of simple three-dimensional stabilizer codes, called the chiral color codes, that realize fermionic and chiral topological orders. In the qubit case, the code realizes the topological phase of a single copy of the fermionic toric code. For qudit systems with local dimension dd the model features a chiral parameter α\alpha and realizes 3D topological phases characterized by ZdαZ_d^\alpha anyon theories with anomalous chiral surface topological order. Furthermore, we prove that the bulk is short-range entangled (for odd dd, coprime α\alpha) by constructing an explicit local quantum channel that prepares the ground state. The chiral color codes are constructed within the gauge color code, and hence inherit its fault-tolerant features: they admit single-shot error correction and allow code switching to other stabilizer color codes. These properties position the chiral color codes as particularly useful platforms for realizing and manipulating fermions and chiral anyons. In the last part of the talk, I will also explain chiral stabilizer mixed states that arise at the boundary of chiral color codes, which cannot be diagnosed by the either modular commutator or chiral central charge.

Emma Rosenfeld

Magic state cultivation on a superconducting quantum processor

Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires a universal gate set, but the necessary non-Clifford gates represent a significant resource cost for most quantum error correction architectures. Magic state cultivation offers an efficient alternative to resource-intensive distillation protocols; however, testing the proposal’s assumptions represents a challenging departure from quantum memory experiments. We present an experimental study of magic state cultivation on a superconducting quantum processor. We implement cultivation, including code-switching into a surface code, and develop a fault-tolerant measurement protocol to bound the magic state fidelity. Cultivation reduces the error by a factor of 40, with a state fidelity of 0.9999(1) (retaining 8% of attempts). Our results experimentally establish magic state cultivation as a viable solution to one of quantum computing’s most significant challenges.

Esha Swaroop

Universal Adapters between Quantum LDPC codes

In the last few years, quantum LDPC codes have developed to become serious contenders for the fault-tolerant architecture needed to build a large-scale quantum computer. This interest has spurred recent developments in low-overhead computing with these codes, such as by leveraging inherent symmetries present in the quantum LDPC code, or by deforming arbitrary codes. In this talk, we will focus on the latter approach, and discuss extensions to quantum LDPC surgery following the work of Hastings [arXiv:2102.10030] and Cohen et al. [10.1126/sciadv.abn1717, 2022].

Our main result is the measurement of joint logical Pauli operators between arbitrary quantum LDPC codes using ancillary qubits hosting a repetition code of equivalent distance, which functions as a code adapter for logical gates as well as code switching. This adapter is universal in the sense that it works regardless of the LDPC codes involved and the logical Paulis being measured. The number of additional qubits scales quasi-linearly, or in some cases linearly, with the weight of the Pauli logical operator to be measured.

Using a similarly constructed adapter, we also show a way to unitarily implement targeted logical gates on arbitrary LDPC codes, by efficiently mediating with a code hosting the required symmetries for more exotic gates.

Friederike Butt

Code switching for measurement-free quantum computing

The ability to perform quantum error correction (QEC) and robust gate operations on encoded qubits is a key step toward practical demonstrations of quantum algorithms. Contemporary QEC schemes typically require mid-circuit measurements with feed-forward control, which are challenging for qubit control, often slow, and susceptible to relatively high error rates. I present protocols for a measurement-free universal toolbox of fault-tolerant logical operations based on code switching between two- and three-dimensional colour codes. Individually, neither two- nor three-dimensional topologies support a universal transversal gate set {H, T, CNOT}, with the T-gate missing in the two-dimensional and the H-gate in the three-dimensional case. However, by transferring encoded information between a two- and a three-dimensional code while preserving the logical state gives access to a full transversal universal gate set. I discuss the conditions required for fault-tolerant code switching and how these conditions can be satisfied in practice. Building on this, I extend code switching to a fully measurement-free setting, where protocols are implemented using coherent fault-tolerant circuits that avoid feed-forward during algorithm execution. Finally, I demonstrate that this measurement-free toolbox enables the execution of fault-tolerant quantum algorithms, exemplified by a realization of Grover’s search on encoded logical qubits.

Grace Sommers

Spectral properties and coding transitions of Haar-random quantum codes

Abstract: A quantum error-correcting code with a nonzero error threshold undergoes a mixed-state phase transition when the error rate reaches that threshold. We explore this phase transition for Haar-random quantum codes, in which the logical information is encoded in a random subspace of the physical Hilbert space. We focus on the spectrum of the encoded system density matrix as a function of the rate of uncorrelated, single-qudit errors. For low error rates, this spectrum consists of well-separated bands, corresponding to errors of different weights. As the error rate increases, the bands for high-weight errors merge. The evolution of these bands with increasing error rate is well described by a simple analytic ansatz. Using this ansatz, as well as an explicit calculation, we show that the threshold for Haar-random quantum codes saturates the hashing bound, and thus coincides with that for random stabilizer codes. For error rates that exceed the hashing bound, typical errors are uncorrectable, but postselected error correction remains possible until a much higher detection threshold. Postselection can in principle be implemented by projecting onto subspaces corresponding to low-weight errors, which remain correctable past the hashing bound.

Josias Old

Addressable fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations for high-rate lift-connected surface codes

Quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes are among the leading candidates to realize error-corrected quantum memories with low qubit overhead. Potentially high encoding rates and large distance relative to their block size make them appealing for practical suppression of noise in near-term quantum computers. In addition to increased qubit-connectivity requirements compared to more conventional topological quantum error correcting codes, qLDPC codes remain notoriously hard to compute with. In this work, we introduce a construction to implement all Clifford quantum gate operations on the recently introduced lift-connected surface (LCS) codes (Old et al. 2024). These codes can be implemented in a 3D-local architecture and achieve asymptotic scaling [[n, O(n1/3), O(n1/3)]] . In particular, LCS codes realize favorable instances with small numbers of qubits: For the [[15,3,3]]-LCS code, we provide deterministic fault-tolerant (FT) circuits of the logical gate set {Hi, Si, CiXj}i,j in (0,1,2) based on flag qubits. By adding a procedure for FT magic state preparation, we show quantitatively how to realize an FT universal gate set in d=3 LCS codes. Numerical simulations indicate that our gate constructions can attain pseudothresholds in the range of 4.8*10-3 – 1.2*10-2 for circuit-level noise. The schemes use a moderate number of qubits and are therefore feasible for near-term experiments, facilitating progress for fault-tolerant error corrected logic in high-rate qLPDC codes.

Jun Zen

Dynamic Compass Code

Michael Vasmer

Fault-tolerant transformations of spacetime codes

Recent advances in quantum error-correction (QEC) have shown that it is often beneficial to understand fault-tolerance as a dynamical process, a circuit with redundant measurements that help correct errors, rather than as a static code equipped with a syndrome extraction circuit. Spacetime codes have emerged as a natural framework to understand error correction at the circuit level while leveraging the traditional QEC toolbox. Here, we introduce a framework based on chain complexes and chain maps to model spacetime codes and transformations between them. We show that stabilizer codes, quantum circuits, and decoding problems can all be described using chain complexes, and that the equivalence of two spacetime codes can be characterized by specific maps between chain complexes, the fault-tolerant maps, that preserve the number of encoded qubits, fault distance, and minimum-weight decoding problem. As an application of this framework, we extend the foliated cluster state construction from stabilizer codes to any spacetime code, showing that any Clifford circuit can be transformed into a measurement-based protocol with the same fault-tolerant properties. To this protocol, we associate a chain complex which encodes the underlying decoding problem, generalizing previous cluster state complex constructions. Our method enables the construction of cluster states from non-CSS, subsystem, and Floquet codes, as well as from logical Clifford operations on a given code.

Joint work with Arthur Pesah, Austin K. Daniel, and Ilan Tzitrin https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09603

Paul Webster

The Pinnacle Architecture

More to come.

Schedule

Registration

Members of the University of Sydney’s Quantum Theory Group and invited speakers can register for free through the Google form provided via email.

Members of the general public can express their interest here. Decisions will be sent out on the 19th of January.

Accommodation

Coogee Bay Hotel : 253 Coogee Bay Rd, COOGEE NSW 2034

  • Availability is limited, so early reservations are recommended.
  • Breakfast at Marra Bar & Grill is included.
  • Car parking is available for $30 per night.
  • Cancellations require at least 48 hours’ notice to avoid a fee.

Committee

Logo of conference sponsor, Sydney Nano Institute
Logo for conference sponsor, Google

Code of Conduct

The Coogee Sydney Quantum Information Theory Workshop is dedicated to providing a discrimination- and harassment-free experience for all attendees. All speakers and participants are expected to comply with the workshop Code of Conduct.

View Code of Conduct

The Sydney Quantum Information Theory Workshop is committed to ensuring attendees are not subjected to behaviours, practices or processes that may constitute discrimination, harassment or victimisation outlined by this code and by the law.

This Code of Conduct intends to provide guidance to workshop attendees in their interactions with others during the workshop.

This Code is a set of general principles rather than detailed prescriptions. It stands besides but does not exclude or replace the rights and responsibilities of members to their employing organisations, under Common Law or any Commonwealth and State legislations.

Any sort of discrimination, harassment or victimisation will not be tolerated, and any concerns should be raised to Workshop organisers so immediate appropriate action can be taken.

Personal and professional conduct

Workshop attendees should:

  • refrain from all forms of discrimination, harassment and victimisation;
  • treat other members and members of the public with dignity, courtesy and respect; and
  • give due credit to the contributions of others.

Discrimination and sexual harassment

Discrimination is treating, or proposing to treat, someone unfavourably because of personal characteristics which includes a disability, parental status, race, colour, descent, national origin, age, sex, industrial activities, religion, pregnancy, breastfeeding, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, political opinion, social origin, medical record, or an association with someone who has or is assumed to have one of these personal characteristics or may have it at some time in the future.

Sexual Harassment is a specific and serious form of harassment. It is unwelcome sexual behaviour, which could be expected to make a person feel offended, humiliated or intimidated. Sexual harassment can be physical, spoken or written. It can include:

  • comments about a person’s private life or the way they look;
  • sexually suggestive behaviour, such as leering or staring;
  • sexually suggestive comments or jokes;
  • displaying offensive screen savers, photos, calendars or objects;
  • repeated unwanted requests to go out;
  • sexually explicit posts on social networking sites;
  • insults or taunts of a sexual nature;
  • intrusive questions or statements about a person’s private life;
  • sending sexually explicit emails or text messages;
  • inappropriate advances on social networking sites; and
  • behaviour that may also be considered to be an offence under criminal law, such as physical assault, indecent exposure, sexual assault, stalking or obscene communications.

Workshop attendees are asked to:

  • not discriminate anyone in connection with the Workshop on any personal characteristics;
  • not engage in any form of sexual harassment; and
  • ensure all communication is appropriate for a professional audience including people from different backgrounds and personal characteristics. Sexual language and imagery in presentations is not appropriate.

Victimisation

Victimisation is subjecting or threatening to subject someone to a detriment because they have asserted their rights under equal opportunity law, made a complaint, helped someone else make a complaint, or refused to do something because it would be discrimination, sexual harassment or victimisation.

It is also victimisation to threaten someone (such as a witness) who may be involved in investigating an equal opportunity concern or complaint.

Workshop attendees are asked to not engage in, nor encourage any forms of victimisation.

Breaches of the Code of Conduct

Breaches of this Code of Conduct will not be tolerated. Any breaches or concerns should be reported to any of workshop organisers, anonymously if desired:

Any communication regarding the breach of conduct will be treated confidentially and will be responded to within 24 hours if contact details are supplied. Participants will be asked to stop any inappropriate behaviour immediately. Participants may be asked to leave workshop and may be barred from attending future workshops.

Title image: Coogee Beach Sydney by Lenny K Photography, CC BY 2.0